Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Okanagan - Buying a New Home - Charges against title


Understanding the legal issues with purchasing a property or new home can be very challenging. The following article written by Una Gabie of Pushor Mitchell will explain Encumbrances or charges against title.

Buying a new home can be an extremely exciting process. It can also come with its own stresses. There are many things to keep in mind, in addition to the physical condition of the property, when you are purchasing a new home including encumbrances registered against title to the property. Encumbrances, in general terms, are charges registered against title which may restrict the use of the property in some way or, in some cases, provide additional benefits to the property owner. Encumbrances include statutory rights of way, easements, covenants, and statutory building schemes. Each of these charges has a different purpose. A statutory right of way generally provides certain bodies with the ability to make use of some portion of the property. For example, utility services for a home on a property are dealt with by statutory right of way. Easements can either benefit the property owner or permit a neighboring property to make some use of the property. For example, some properties are set up such that the driveway crosses another person’s property and, therefore, an easement can be registered to protect the benefiting property’s route of access. Restrictive covenants can limit a person’s right to make certain uses of their property while a statutory building scheme may dictate certain things with respect to buildings or improvements on the land. It is very important to carefully review these encumbrances prior to or at the time of the purchase so that you, as the purchaser and new home owner, is aware of the restrictions on your rights. Your legal advisor can assist you with understanding the impact of these charges.

If you are purchasing property that is part of a strata development, additional considerations arise. You should be alert to the status of the strata by reviewing the bylaws, receiving disclosure with respect to the contingency fund, and ensuring that all strata fees have been paid to date and that you are aware of your strata fee obligations. The strata bylaws can limit such things as the pet and rental allowances for your unit. Again, your legal advisor can assist you with this and make sure that you fully understand the restrictions with respect to the property you are purchasing.

Purchasing property on First Nations land raises its own unique considerations because such land is sold on a leasehold basis rather than freehold. This means that you, as the purchaser, are acquiring your rights to the lands and/or improvements pursuant to a lease. It is important to have your legal advisor review these considerations with you.

If you have any questions about purchasing your home, please feel free to contact Una Gabie at Pushor Mitchell LLP at (250)869-1230 or by email at gabie@pushormitchell.com.

Friday, May 22, 2009

New pump technology cuts noise and energy consumption by 75%...Valley Pools Kelowna

Here is some great news for pool owners form Gene Brown of Valley Pools

Greetings,

I don't know if "pool equipment noise" has been a concern for you on any of your projects. Some municipalities are getting so fed up with complaints of noisy pool pumps that they've mandated sound enclosures for all pool equipments. My partner Skip and I laugh at the ridiculousness of these efforts, when such an easy solution is available.

At least one of the leading pool equipment manufacturers has come out with a new "Variable Frequency Drive" pump design that has brought pump noise down to a whisper. By no great surprise, the electrical consumption has dropped dramatically as well. We've been using these new pumps for more than three years now, and getting outstanding results.

Admittedly, these new pumps aren't just "plug & play. The overall success of this new technology is dependent on three things. It requires:

An intelligent hydraulics design
Highly efficient, oversized plumbing
Proper programming for slightly longer running times at significantly lower amperages
If "noise abatement" and/or "energy efficiency" have been a concern for you on any of your projects, you may want to take a closer look at the attached article, where Skip describes the concepts and challenges in greater detail. Or give us a call. We're happy to help you with any pool-related design or construction challenges.
Till next time,



Gene Brown
President, Valley Pool And Spa

Friday, January 16, 2009

Flywheel - Building Codes - Hail to the Building Inspector


Love them or hate them, building inspectors are a necessity to ensuring the minimum life, safety and structural (and now green code) requirements are being met in residential construction. The main goal of a building official is to make sure the general public is protected. That is not the owner of the home or the builder but the general public over the life span of that building. Unfortunately some are either overwhelmed with work, controlled by superiors or tend to like the authority too much and may rub the home owner or builder the wrong way. Liability concerns may also trump what can or not be done in your area. This is especially true if you are trying to do something unique or beyond the basic requirements of codes.

I've found one good example of what you may be or have experienced with a building inspector. HAIL THE BUILDING INSPECTOR

Having issues with your local authority? Contact Flywheel Building Solutions

Saturday, December 20, 2008

Flywheel - Hot tubs and decks


For further information on building code related items, contact us at www.flywheelbuildingsolutions.com

If you have recently installed or are thinking of installing a hot tub on your raised patio or deck the following may be of interest to you. Decks that are above 24"(600mm) from finished grade (ground level) are required to have a guard.

In a recent ruling (BCAB#1651) from the Building Code Appeal Board has reversed a Building Officials decision to require additional guards for a hot tub install.

The hot tub had been installed in the exterior corner of the deck about 24" form the edges and guard of the deck. The height of the outer edge fo the hot tub is about 40" above the deck's floor surface. There are provisions for seating around the outer edge of the tub. When not in use, the tub is provided with a rigid cover.

The Building Official stated that do to it's proximity to the balcony guard and the height of the hot tub outer edge with respect to the height of the balcony guard, that a slip or fall that may occur in or on the tub, would render the existing balcony guard ineffective. The Building Official requested an additional guard height of 42" above the top surface of the hot tub. The specific code reference - Sentence 9.8.8.1.(1) requires every surface to which access is provided for other than maintenance purposes shall be protected by a guard on each side that is not protected by a wall for the length. The minimum guard height in this situation is 1070mm (42").

In it's decision the Board decided that in practical terms it made sense to prevent people from falling backwards over the existing railing system, the Building Official can not request the additional guard height as the hot tub edge was not considered a walking surface.

Contact Flywheel Building Solutions if you require clarification on a code reference. www.flywheelbuildingsolutions.com

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Flywheel - Building codes - ABC’s of Avoiding Claims


If you have built, are building or planning to build there are likely times when you have wondered why building departments do the things that they do. Local jurisdictions that elect to handle building permits, yes you could live in a home that never had building permits and inspections, face the challenge of protecting the pubic safety and health (and now reducing the carbon footprint) as well as protecting against future liability. After the leaky condo crisis many municipalities have written bylaws and improved internal policies to reduce risk (some have not), which have led to builders and owners getting frustrated on the amount of red tape to work through. In future newsletters we will discuss the importance of codes, bylaws and keeping proper records and taking more responsibility as the owner. But for now we will start with a list prepared by Frank Cowan Company Ltd (who specialize in risk management for municipalities), which outlines what a Building Inspector should do to avoid claims and it may shed some light on why they do the things they do or could do better.

Avoid acting as a consultant

Be aware of changes to construction, which may require revised plans.

Communicate to potential new buyers any outstanding orders or open permits.

During inspection, document deficiencies, issue orders when necessary and follow-up to ensure compliance.
Ensure drawings are sealed by an architect or professional engineer where appropriate.

Files and records should be kept in accordance with the Statue of Limitations.

Get to know your builders. Which ones will follow the building code and which ones will take short cuts.

Have procedures for consistent plan reviews.

Inspections completed today will need to stand the test of time. Remember the subsequent owner.

Judges rely on documentation to formulate a decision. What will your documents reveal about the inspection?

Keep you documentation consistent and objective. Checklists will allow you to do this. It is also an excellent tool to ensure a complete inspection.

Liability for negligent building inspection arises at the plan approval stage and the on-site inspection stage.

Municipalities that make a decision to conduct building inspections are at law, held to owe duty to the individual property owners, future property owners and the public at large to properly review plans, issue building permits and conduct inspections.

Never admit liability.

Owner acting as the Builder is a potential red flag.

Plans submitted should be detailed enough to carry out a proper review. Do not expect less.

Qualified persons are required to prepare plans for building permits.

Remember to follow up on deficiencies found during permits.

Safety of the present owner, future owner and potential visitors to a property must be considered, particularly associated with an occupancy.

The building code is your bible. Refer to it when in doubt.

Understand that by the time a claim is made, the municipality may be the only defendant left to sue. Other parties may have gone bankrupt, may not exist or may not have liability policies that will respond.

Verify that all required documentation has been received before issuing a permit.

What length of time do you allow inactive permits to remain open? Why do you allow them to remain open?

X’pect a red flag when the contractor is working outside of his usual expertise or is a new builder.

You have the power to order work to be uncovered when it is covered before you’ve inspected.

Zero in on the aspects of construction within the Building Code that are related to health, safety and structural stability.

Saturday, September 6, 2008

Flywheel - Secondary Suites - Penticton

After 13 years since the allowance of secondary suites in the BC Building Code. The city of Penticton has opted to recognize that secondary suites are a necessary evil in today's housing market. Until recently, like many municipalities Penticton had turned a blind eye to the growing number of suites acting on a complaint only basis for bylaw enforcement. But with the growing price of housing in the area, there is little chance a first time home owner could carry a mortgage without a suite. There is also a growing trend for Baby Boomers to help their children out by sharing a single family home or having someone live in their 2nd residence as they travel abroad or go south for the winter. As most financial do not recognize legal or non-legal suites, this has forced many to go under the radar or flat out lie to inspection departments and finish the suite area off after final occupancy inspections have been granted for new homes. Some municipalities have blurred the lines by allowing "in-law" suites but many have been phasing this abused option out as well such as the City of Kelowna.

As someone who rented for 12 years in the Lower Mainland and was an in inspector in the Coquitlam, one of the first municipalities to legalize suites in BC, I've seen the need to make affordable rental safe for both tenant and land owner.

But before you get too excited, there are a number of catches, particularly with adding a suite to an existing single family home. Besides the additional permit fees, including $100 to register the Housing Agreement at Land Titles ( This is prove that the owner of the property of the home lives in the house containing a suite). There are some weird provisions for maintaining the look of the existing home as well as restrictions to adding onto the home once a suite has been installed. It appears additions to the home are not permitted to add a secondary suite or it may not be allowed to update the exterior of your home when adding a suite. It is unclear if it it would be allowed to add to your home one year and make a suite the next. Secondary suites are not allowed in detached buildings often called "carriage homes".

The city of Penticton planning department is in the process of reviewing some of the suite requirements and can be reached at PENTICTON SECONDARY SUITES or contact us for more information or a free on-site consultation at Flywheel Building Solutions - 250 859 6062

Thursday, September 4, 2008

Flywheel - Green Code - Okanagan requirements

The new green requirements in the Code come into effect on September 5, 2008 and will apply to all new construction and renovations in BC. The new requirements will apply to building permit applications submitted on or after September 5, 2008. These changes revolve around new Building Code requirements to increase energy and water efficiency.

But what does this mean to us here in the Okanagan and are they enough?

Unless you are building commercial or high-rise projects, there is little change to what is required under the basic provisions of the 2006 BC Building Code and local Building Bylaws.

Energy Efficiency

Increased engergy requirements for residential projects under 5 storeys have only seen an increase for Attic insulation values from R40 to R44.

Water Efficiency

As most jurisdictions have already adopted measures towards water efficiency - 6 litre flush toilets. It should not be a large leap towards meeting the maximum flow and flush cylcles required by code. These would include:

Maximum Flow Rates

Kitchen & Lavatory - 8.3L/min

Shower Heads - 9.5L/min (I am not sure how multiple head shower stalls could be considered "green")

Maximum Flush Cycles

Water Closets (Toilets) Tank Type - 6.0 Litres

Water Closets Direct Flush - 6.0 Litres

Urinal - Tank and Direct Flush - 5.7 Litres

Ensuring that your builder, suppliers and sub-trades have the corret information and product on hand will be the key factor to ensuring you meet the new green codes. Do I feel that these changes will make a significant impact - NO. But at least we are moving in the right direction.

Details on the new requirements are available in the Summary and Text of Code Changes.

If you are wondering what is in store for more improvements to green codes you may want to look at the City of Vancouver's Building Bylaw. http://vancouver.ca/blStorage/9691.PDF

Code Design Build

Blogs I Follow